Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Legion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel Legion[edit]

Non-notable organization. Seems to piggy-back on 501st; GHits don't reflect any significant third-party coverage. --EEMIV (talk) 14:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Already has two independent sources cited. Ghits are not necessarily indicative of anything. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. A dead link and a link to a page that contains no mention of the Rebel Alliance are perhaps not the best references to "two independent sources" that one might desire. Deor (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable fan group, unsourced accept to "starwars.com". In the real world, this organization simply doesn't even graze the notability bar.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources that point to notability. Athanasius • Quicumque vult 18:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.