Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabinder Lala (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rabinder Lala[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor government official who doesn't satisfy WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a single reliable source is found on Internet. No coverage at all, fails GNG and if the person is alive, fails wp:BIO. Jim Carter 04:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too junior for inherent notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete none of his roles confer notability. And no coverage to support WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of adequate notability. Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails general notability guidelines and WP:ANYBIO. None of his positions are notable. Jbh ^Talk 13:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.