Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pulmonary embolism. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of numerous sets of criteria for the diagnosis or exclusion of pulmonary embolism. No evidence of widespread use. Not individually notable. JFW | T@lk 23:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ascidian | talk-to-me 00:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria[reply]

Comment This discussion was not added to a log page but I've listed it now. (see discussion here). ascidian | talk-to-me 00:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rewrite: PubMed comes up with four different resources [1] and some of the first 80 hits on Google seem more than promising. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 06:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Jake Wartenberg 21:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria[reply]

Stub and merge to Pulmonary embolism#Diagnosis. This isn't really suitable for a separate page, but it has been talked about enough in medical circles to warrant including briefly in the main article. Fences&Windows 23:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove copyvio text from here, merge to Pulmonary embolism#Diagnosis, award article a prize for its stunningly unwieldy title. pablo_hablo. 10:18, 15 September 2009

It's all about the acronyms in medicine... PERC. Snappy. Fences&Windows 00:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.