Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulikkodan Narayanan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting as nn and a clear blp issue too Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pulikkodan Narayanan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find passing mentions of him, nothing that passes WP:NBIO. There may be more sources in Hindu but I don't speak the language and can't find any Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 19:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's an e-mail at OTRS Ticket:2019040410002251 where the poster claims that As per the supreme court verdict he is free from all the charges against him - assuming that is true (the poster offered to send more data if needed - but I'll point him here as well), then there does not seem to be much of an article at all. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:48, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an attack page written from a pro-Naxalite POV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Rajan case. Mid-ranking officer involved in a single notable incident when he was even more junior. Not enough for individual notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.