Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protectobots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Autobots. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protectobots[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This grouping does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Autobots. BOZ (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Autobots. Fictional group with no notability or non-trivial sources. They're already present on the master list of characters, so no merging is necessary. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or merge as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.