Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Choudhary (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 March 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanka Choudhary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG plus WP:TOOSOON. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ManaliJain (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do think this was eligible for CSD G4, as there seems to be very little difference between this page and the previously deleted version, which, incidentally, was moved to draft and is still hanging around at Draft:Priyanka Choudhary. The mainspace page was previously salted, however as Shikagami03 is now extended-confirmed, they were able to recreate it. So if we want the salting to stick, it'll need to be full-protected. Since this was both tagged for speedy and an AFD was opened, I thought it better to let the AFD play out rather than to delete it without discussion. Shikagami03, please participate in this discussion. Please add more sources to the article to demonstrate that she meets the notability requirements for actors. If this ends in delete, please work on the version in draft space rather than recreating the article in mainspace. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given the creator has extensively edited the draft, it's disheartening to see them just creating the article, and I'm betting it's a copy-paste from the draft which has an extensive edit history going back over a year. The last AFD was April 2021, so they really should be respecting that consensus, and go through the draft process, not ignoring that consensus as they've done. I warned them on Feb 4 [1] about doing just this, obviously that warning didn't take. Add in the copyrighted image for Priyanka they uploaded, this may be time for ANI. Ravensfire (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think a lot of the concerns raised on the April 2021 AFD are still valid. She's appeared a several movies that don't have a lot of notice, which is not helpful for meeting WP:NACTOR. A lot of the sources are from Times of India which is generally discounted as you can't tell paid from unpaid (and that's especially true around entertainment!). Several of those are interviews, which can be good for information, but not as much for notability. Links to trailers and official videos, likewise. I'm still seeing only the one significant role. I've pulled out some of the name-dropping and puffery from the article, and some unsupported "parallel lead" stuff. Ravensfire (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: NACTOR needs multiple significant roles in notable productions backed up by reliable sources, which I'm not seeing here. Most Indian TV shows themselves rest on shaky notability, so solid sources are needed to claim significant roles in them. -- Ab207 (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.