Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyurethane foam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 09:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polyurethane foam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't need to be split from Polyurethane. AppuruPan (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable enough to warrant its own article. RadManCF (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @958 · 21:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep

per RadManCF - it is notable
it is already redirected to Polyurethane uses
both articles are plenty large and have citations -articles that are too long are disfavored, as most users of Wikipedia use dial-up service. Bearian (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I guess it's a matter of opinion as to whether a 76K sized article should be split into smaller articles. Polyurethane uses is a logical spinoff from polyurethane, and it's probably more appropriate to have two articles, one aimed at the chemically literate, and this one, aimed at the other 99 percent of people who consult encyclopedias. Mandsford (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Article is already a redirect. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - acceptable spin off from a very long article, and arguably notable in its own right. Robofish (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - spin off from a long article which has been suggested for splitting - easily notable. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.