Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playermaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. RL0919 (talk) 21:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Playermaker[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NCORP, reads more like a promotional piece rather than an encyclopedia article, lack of reliable sources, and the involved editors' behavior is suspicious, user:Playermakerwiki is banned for COI, user:Matteom.pm disclosed he is a part of the company while uploading the logo, and the same day he blanked his sandbox another editor who is likely paid, user:Maltuguom came across the article and updated it with similar content to Matteom.pm's sandbox.-- Bosecovey (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 15:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 15:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which show notability. Giant Snowman 21:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] among many more sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes NCORP from my prospective. Sources are not that bad either, and above is also fine. Govvy (talk) 10:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.