Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physician Champion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Opinion leadership. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Physician Champion[edit]

Probable copyvio. An SPA who can't even spell the title of the article correctly created three identical articles that read like they've been lifted from a medical paper. They include a "bibliography" - a sure sign of a copypaste from somewhere. A likely paper is the only reference given in the article. I can't log in to see the full paper but it bears all the hallmarks of a copyvio. andy (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also nominating the identical articles Physician Champions and Physcian Champions andy (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NOR rant. JFW | T@lk 23:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Opinion leadership. If this is not copyvio then it is OR. - Sgroupace (talk) 00:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It may in fact be OR after all - see here. andy (talk) 06:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Opinion leadership. The specific term is in use in the pharma industry, but the concept is identical. I'm sure some industry magazine would be happy to print a piece like this, but it's not for Wikipedia. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.