Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Jean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peggy Jean[edit]

Only appeared in two minor storylines, no secondary sources found. Doesn't seem worth the merge since it's probably not the only Peggy Jean in the world. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I could see a merge proposal, but deletion? Really? ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And your reason for keeping is…? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Peggy Jean is a fictional character in the comic strip Peanuts." So it makes more sense to me to propose a merge. The comic is notable. The character has some notable. It's a question of whether she should have her own article, not whether to delete. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is never inherited though. I proposed deletion since I thought she was too obscure for a merge. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never say never. Bands with a notable member are considered notable per WP:MUSIC, so your assumption fails on at least one count. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep when I typed "Peggy Jean" into Google it suggested I complete it as peggy jean charlie brown with over 300K results. This is a reasonable fork-for-length of Peanuts or Charlie Brown. JJL (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JJL's research. Needs sources added to it though badly.travb (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There do appear to be sources.[1][2] - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no sources showing notability have been added to the article. Boston (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Due to the sources provided by Fisher and the search by JJL, meets WP:N. --J.Mundo (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notability established the usual way. Wily D 14:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Entirely plot summary, no sources in the article to indicate notability. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to out of universe encyclopedic coverage in reliable sources that indicate notability. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.