Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Katherine Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Michael Jackson#HIStory, second marriage and fatherhood (1995–99) and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Katherine Jackson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON I think. Only notability so far is due to being Michael Jackson's daughter. The film role may lead to notability in the future, but not at this point. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, with no prejudice against recreating if the movie gets made. For now, tho, too soon, as the movie could get cancelled. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then restore and protect the redirect. WP is not a celebrity gossip-mag to follow 14-year-olds about. IMDb shows this film only as in development - if/when it appears and gets reviews, that may be independent notability enough for an article. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agreed, this may be different in the future, but there is no inherent notability for being Michael Jackson's only daughter. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is quite weird to make a page about somebody who hasn't done anything with his career yet and is famous for being someone's famous relative only.
- Comment This is such a perfect example of Too Soon that I have explicitly cited this discussion at Wikipedia:Too soon. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When she was on Ellen or interviewed elsewhere, was it only about her father Michael Jackson? Dream Focus 02:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. There is now a continuing stream of activity of interviews with her, including one by Oprah. Wikipedia:Too soon is relevant, but when is soon enough for inevitable? She has an agent now, so once she's signed to an acting job... http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1336920/ 66.186.163.112 (talk) 21:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (Redirect as suggested by JohnCD is OK, after history is deleted.) At this point she is notable only for two things: having a very famous father, and making moving comments at her father's funeral. One type of notability is forbidden by WP:INHERIT and the other by WP:BLP1E. At this point I regard her as a private citizen and a very young teenager, whose privacy should not be invaded like this. (Do we really need to announce to a world full of kooks what school she goes to? Do we really need to post a photocopy of her birth certificate for heavens sake?) --MelanieN (talk) 02:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.