Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of public transport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. I apologize for wasting their precious time who participated in this discussion. (non-admin closure) Masum Reza^📞 18:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of public transport[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Masum Reza^📞 15:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Public transport is so obviously notable that the nomination must be some kind of mistake. Andrew D. (talk) 17:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As above. I would be more than happy to review this if the nominator gave a more in-depth arguement as to why it should be deleted. Gazamp (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No citation to prove notability. Fails WP:GNG. Masum Reza^📞 17:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should read WP:OUTLINE, as you seem unfamiliar with the concept. Citations are not needed in an outline. MarkZusab (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Actually Wikipedia has tons of policy and guideline pages that I sometimes forget to read some of them. I am going to withdraw this AfD. Masum Reza^📞 18:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.