Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Sump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Sump[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I proposed deletion back in 2011. My rationale then was "Non-notable comics character. No reliable sources cited." The template was removed and an encyclopedia of fictional characters was added in a references section (though not really cited). Eight years later, Piotrus proposed deletion again, writing " Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION." Though I agree that the article should be deleted, it is not eligible for proposed deletion, so I bring it here. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no indication that Otto Sump has been meaningfully discussed by any academic or journalistic sources. It is also telling that many of the Google Books results contained references to long-dead people who shared a name with this character. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 10:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above discussion. There does not appear to be enough coverage to support stand-alone notability. Aoba47 (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no independent, real-world notability. --Nicknack009 (talk) 13:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.