Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olidammara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Greyhawk deities. MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olidammara[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not establish notability, only relying on primary sources. TTN (talk) 14:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Greyhawk deities. I'll note that this was done to Hextor a little bit ago, and stipulate that most of these fictional deities are not likely to have independent RS'ing, and merging ALL of them in a consistent manner is likely a better use of our time than repeated AfD's. Jclemens (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to do it, I'll hold off on AfDs. If you can get a consensus I can refer to in the edit summaries, I'll do it myself. It's just that nobody ever actually follows through with doing it. TTN (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- You know, TTN, if you exercised due care and appropriate editing with the mergers, I'd be quite impressed, as I don't recall seeing such work from you before. I won't revert them. Jclemens (talk) 16:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - For what it's worth, I've been merging a fair few of these over the last few weeks (take a look at the history of goblinoid deities, gnome deities, halfling deities, dwarf deities, drow deities and elf deities). Nobody has raised any objections (or, indeed engaged with me) at all. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Greyhawk deities. BOZ (talk) 01:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect as above, until there is evidence of independent notability. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.