Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuno Fonseca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Nuno Fonseca[edit]
- Delete substub, no indication of notablility, not found among the first several Google hits on this name. -- * Delete Jmabel | Talk 06:11, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep [1] shows he's notable enough to get an article in a specialist magazine. He comes up with a small number of Ghits which isn't bad for someone in under-represented Portugal. Maybe just managing to work for 40 years is notable for illustrators? Dlyons493 Talk 07:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. There's a difference between being an illustrator for 40 years and working for 40 years. I've met plenty of people in Hollywood who say they've been an actor for years but really worked as one for weeks... Ifnord 18:29, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim to notability. For any common career, working for 40 years is not notable. Verifiable accomplishments are notable, no matter how long they took. None are given here. --A D Monroe III 22:52, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is a Nuno Fonseca who might just scrape in, but I don't think this is him. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 23:27, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.