Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nkawkaw Senior High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nkawkaw Senior High School[edit]

Nkawkaw Senior High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing much to be notable. While I agree with WP:NSCHOOLS, "secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject both to the standards of notability, as well as those for organizations." I can't find any WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRITE for a simple article. WP:SIRS already was not enough except for the schools 50th anniversary. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This may not be the most influential school in all of Ghana, but it meets the GNG and WP:NORG. See source analysis below. Bgv. (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Babegriev, I still guess why this and this should be called WP:SIGCOV or attribution for WP:GNG. Per WP:NHSCHOOL, these are type of sources used to clarify a school exist just not about notability. It was a passing mention of "breaking a teacher's windscreen or thereabout" in this source, and here about a set/class that did something for the school (which is no way notability). It's very hard to see this things and say a school lacks notability, that's why even the SNG guideline says "all school are assumed to be notable". You can also see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOME. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.ghanaiantimes.com.gh/nkawkaw-shs-celebrates-50th-anniversary/ Yes No association with subject known Yes Meets WP:NEWSORG Yes School is the subject of the article Yes
https://newsghana.com.gh/nkawkaw-shs-lacks-logistics/ Yes No association with subject known ~ Appears to meet WP:NEWSORG Yes Critical article about the school and its administration ~ Partial
https://www.modernghana.com/news/1119989/solution-to-west-african-senior-school-certificate.html Yes No association with subject known Yes Meets WP:NEWSORG Yes Speaks to the school's involvement with a state examination controversy. Yes
https://www.modernghana.com/news/817913/nkawkaw-senior-high-school-receives-support-from-1992-year-g.html Yes No association with subject Yes Meets WP:NEWSORG Yes Coverage of alumna's philanthropy to school. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Did the nominator create this source assessment table? Because if so, it looks like they are putting forth an argument to Keep this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Per Bgv. I agree that it meets GNG and WP:NORG -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 16:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Red X I withdraw my nomination I now agree after cleaning up the article. In future, I will always be willing to clean up first before nominating. I agree with the source assessment table at least for the fact the school exists. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.