Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilladriz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  13:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nilladriz[edit]

Nilladriz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, with references utilised being dubious in nature. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete there is absolutely nothing in the way of coverage and the only sources are fake news sources from black hat SEO spam farms. Praxidicae (talk) 14:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG under WP:ARTIST. PenulisHantu (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the first source, Magazineplus.com, offers "Sponsored Guest Posts". The second source, seekerstime.com, has a contact address that does not exist. The third source, The American Reporter, has an editorial policy that makes clear they will publish anything you like. The lead article on theAmericanreporter.com right now is titled "Mortgage Broker in California" and is very helpful if you are looking for a mortgage, as they link to the brokers. The fourth source, kazimagaine.com, does not have any listed contact info. Number five, thesource.com, is published by a music marketing company. And so on. I hate to use the phrase, but these sources are all a kind of news that rhymes with cake. GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.