Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Afrikan Black Panther Party (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is not consensus to delete the article or anything else other than keep it, though not clear enough to be a consensus, but a default outcome. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Afrikan Black Panther Party[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources given are self-published by the organization or its affiliates. A quick Google search for secondary and tertiary sources only returns one article published by the tabloid The New York Post, while all other secondary/tertiary mentions are by fringe blogs and political websites. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. There is a little bit more out there in reliable sources directly about the group rather than Kevin Rashid Johnson. Journal of African American History, NY Post, PBS. There is material written by members such as on the IWW site] and several articles in San Francisco Bay View. I'm not an expert on this group at all, but I wonder if merge to Kevin Rashid Johnson might work, even though recently he left the group. Much other coverage that mentions the NABPP-PC is actually his journalism and campaigning. Such as The Intercept.OsFish (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep added further RS to the article. There's now enough reliable sourcing to pass WP:NONPROFIT. Given Rashid is no longer a member of the organisation I don't think a redirect there is appropriate. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.