Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerella Sharada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Nerella Sharada

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nerella Sharada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article clearly fails WP:GNG. Becoming a part of Telangana wing of his party and its affiliate organization are not enough for passing our notability criteria. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Keep No evidence of BEFORE. AfD is not cleanup. Multiple sources with significant coverage, meets BASIC.

References

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldsztajn (talk • contribs) 28 February 2020 23:58 (UTC)

All source are presented here are routine coverage. And even sources did not make all article notable all time. Please, see Taimur Ali Khan for details.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 01:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Even if your point was true, which I do not believe it is, routine is not trivial. NB subclause of BASIC: If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.--Goldsztajn (talk) 18:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need more input as to whether Goldsztajn's sources meet GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 19:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

• Delete. I am not seeing how she meets WP:NPOLITICIAN, nor in-depth coverage needed for WP:NBIO/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. She does seem to be meet WP:BASIC with the sources presented. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 23:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:ROUTINE. GNG fail. Dorama285 (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. WP:ROUTINE cannot be invoked in AfD debates on individuals, WP:ROUTINE refers to the notability of events. Nerella Sharada is the president of a district with 1 million+ inhabitants, and a simple google search indicates plenty of coverage. --Soman (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.