Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Power Index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Due to low community involvement in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason. J04n(talk page) 21:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National Power Index[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

talk page has numerous call for deletion by several editors. the reasoning being that it is a POV-pushed page. only one, primary source, and the topic is entirely based upon POV. also is very vauge about what the power ranking actually is. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So there aren't other sources that use or discuss this concept? If that's the case, "non-notable concept" would seem to be a succinct deletion rationale. You didn't find anything else when you followed WP:BEFORE? postdlf (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
none that discus this NPI. there does appear to be a few financial things with the same name, but for this index, the only source I can find is a single wordpress site dedicated to it. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - At best, crystal ball predictions of dubious value outputted from a non-notable computer model. Carrite (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.