Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narbot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Narbot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If I had had an option to tag it under CSD, I would have preferred that. Not notable, no references worth mentioning. Request AfD. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 07:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does not compute I mean delete due to an utter lack of notability. JBsupreme (talk) 07:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 08:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. No mention of it anywhere, not even on irc-junkie.org, so I conclude it's utterly obscure. As I suspected, it has a grand total of 5 downloads. Pcap ping 08:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The only reason I know about it is because I am the project manager for the project that NarBot is a fork of. NarBot doesn't really even classify as a full blown product, it's really just an extension. I assume I can't vote for the deletion due to my relation to NarBot. --onekopaka (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A non-encyclopedic article. Lacks notabilty. Propeng (Talk) 17:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.