Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muine (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable audio player. Can't find any third-party independent sources. Psychonaut (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 12:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I bet User:Spartaz would have closed the previous AfD as delete not keep. The vagaries in judging consensus here are... This seems to be a simple player, perhaps too simple for anyone to review at length. Pcap ping 15:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are two more in-depth pieces here PC World staff blog (scroll down for the muine part) and in this round-up in pclosmag.com. (I'm not familiar with this magazine; it appears that stories are selected from user contributions by a regular staff). Gets briefer, but critical mentions in [1] (says it's a popular player) [2] (a two-sentence review here), [3] (same deal), [4] (says it's one of the two default players in Foresight Linux, whaterver that means), [5] (says it's the default player in SliTaz) [6] (says that it didn't work with MP3FS). Pcap ping 16:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Found more reviews on O'Reilly Media [[7]], not counting masses of linux sites; seems a widespread enough linux player. ¨¨ victor falk 22:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.