Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Min Mee-geum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dae Jang Geum. MBisanz ^talk 01:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Min Mee-geum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, minor character. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Dae Jang Geum as an apparently NN character in a notable fictional media presentation, and per WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 03:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Jclemens. - TheMagnificentist 11:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge minor character. Someone could have done this boldly by now. MrBrug (talk) 15:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It had been merged, MrBrug, but the article kept getting re-created. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see, maybe the redirect needs to be protected in that case. MrBrug (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above commentary. Aoba47 (talk) 18:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dae Jang Geum. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.