Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brewer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brewer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet gng, certainly doesn't meet ncollath John from Idegon (talk) 07:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a simple google news search reveals many articles pointing to the notability of the individual.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He was the starting QB for Virginia Tech (a top level NCAA team) in 2014 (and 2015 til he broke his collarbone in season opener) and has received significant coverage in mainstream media outlets. See here for examples. Passes WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Even though I hate the fact that most of the significant coverage of the subject is the result of his being knocked out of the 2015 season opener, there is ample significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG. Hopefully, the subject will return in the second half of the 2015 season. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Cbl62. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 23:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.