Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metacomic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 07:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metacomic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basic definition with no references. PROD was contested without comment. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Being a basic definition is not a reason to delete; it just means that the page is a WP:STUB. The lack of references is likewise not an issue as the nominator should search for those per WP:BEFORE. It's not as if they don't exist; for example, The Routledge Companion to Comics has a chapter about the topic. AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 14:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for reasons stated by Andrew D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerntrash (talk • contribs) 03:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.