Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Washington Goes to War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Washington Goes to War[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing on the page seems to show how the GNG or NBOOK have been met. I'm not seeing much else JMWt (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there is one review and it won awards, failing that merge to Martha Washington (comics) per WP:PRESERVE would be preferable to deletion. BOZ (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is Frank Miller so influential that this will meet WP:BKCRIT criterion 5? Jclemens (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I would be inclined to say yes.★Trekker (talk) 02:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The book won an Eisner Award, notability is claimed and established.★Trekker (talk) 09:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Gales's Contemporary literary criticism. Annual cumulative title index, Covers volumes 1-306 indicates that there were several reviews, covered in their volume 278. (The entry is "Martha Washington Goes to War (Miller) 278:138, 141-42, 144, 149, 152, 161, 169"). Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.