Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapping of Unicode graphic characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mapping of Unicode characters. Black Kite (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping of Unicode graphic characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This article does a sort of list of character topics, with no sense of structure or completeness at all, let alone giving a good overview. Then, in Unicode, there is no concept of 'graphic character' at all (as I noted on the Talkpage earlier here). Unicode uses a lot of concepts related to 'characters', like say 'Format char'. 'Control char', even 'Code', but never ever 'graphic character'. Content of this (old) page is covered elsewhere. DePiep (talk) 00:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notified creator [1]. -DePiep (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 12. Snotbot t • c » 02:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still not have the faintest idea what step 3 is about, I tried it before and it did not invite me into anything (I thought I was lost) [2]. Intrerestingly, I do one or two TfDs a month, but AfD surprises me.

And to be clear: this is a botted response? Why should I read? A bot that does not know what it is talking about should be shut off. I am really pissed of that this message is brought to me, while the message is nonsense from A to ZX. And I will not be so 'helpful' (to a bot?) that I will go over to edxplain what the bot does. -DePiep (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let me give you an explanation. WP:AFDHOWTO gives as Step 3 various things that you did not do. It is important that you do them. It doesn't understand that you understand why--it will not invite you--you just need to do them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Mapping of Unicode characters, useful information which should be preserved L Faraone 02:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mapping of Unicode characters. There is no separate or specific mapping of graphic characters. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.