Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandy Chiang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Core des at 03:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy Chiang[edit]

Notability unable to be determined. Gives only a sentence about what she does and half a dozen links to outside sites. --Nissi Kim 01:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article has been up for nearly 10 months. I think a span of 10 months merits enough time for "organic" expansion. --Nissi Kim 20:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - IMDB profile. MER-C 02:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:notable Valoem ^talk 03:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete, The article itself is too small and does not seem notable, Weak Keep if someone would show some facts.--Sea dog .M.S 12:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting one, this. She's apparently a celebrity-turned-singer - but nothing explains what made her a celebrity before her singing career (a bit suspicious, that), and 2CDs only is not very impressive, nor is what seems to be a bit-part role in a minor film? On balance, delete. This isn't set in stone - if someone can prove notability to me, I'll think again, but as of now I'm not impressed. Delete Moreschi 12:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Her acting includes parts in some well-known HK films [1] such as New Police Story. She's also been identified as a celebrity by Microsoft [2] and Oxfam [3], and "popular" by Citigroup [4] - though I'd assume most coverage of her isn't written in English. Mereda 16:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - The Chinese Wiki article goes into much more depth, so a translation is probably necessary to fully justify the article. Caknuck 18:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per possible growth --T-rex 20:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Allow for organic expansion -- Librarianofages 21:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - No evidence of non-notability. Incompleteness is not a valid reason for deletion. The Chinese page has a lot of information and appears to be notable --Ineffable3000 22:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the above comments, this is a disappointing nomination for deletion. RFerreira 00:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep — There is enough here to show she has done stuff to be notable, but I agree that the page really needs to be expanded. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 23:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she rocks out better than Mandy Moore. 152.163.100.74 22:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, we are not operating on a deadline, just fix what needs fixing. Yamaguchi先生 03:55, 22 October 2006 03:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.