Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maibec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination czar ⨹ 21:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maibec[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company, relying exclusively on primary sources and unreliable sources except for two WP:CIRCULAR references which I've already stripped, which just demonstrates existence and fails to make a claim of notability strong enough to get it past WP:CORP. As always, Wikipedia is not a PR database on which any company is entitled to have an article just because it exists — no prejudice against recreation in the future if good sources can be added about it, but this version is a delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. New article needing improvement, but already sufficient notability has been established. #199 of top 500 Quebec enterprises... DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (chat) @ 21:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.