Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television series notable for positive reception
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 22:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
List of television series notable for positive reception[edit]
- List of television series notable for positive reception (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of notability. A random collection of TV series. noq (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems to just be a collection of TV series that someone likes. Without reliable sources grouping certain series under a common banner, this is not notable and too vague. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not an intrinsically notable topic; no clear criteria for inclusion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wikipedia is full of pop culture stuff, this fits nicely. There is List of television series notable for negative reception which is of similar scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barney the barney barney (talk • contribs) 21:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no criteria for inclusion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Awful inclusion criteria, we're WP:NOT Rotten Tomatoes for TV, and the negative reception article is full examples of truly bad TV, not just the original article writer using our article formats to post their own personal blog-like opinion. Article creator (currently blocked for edit warring elsewhere) also needs to really needs to learn our inclusion criteria, judging from their warning-packed talk page. Nate • (chatter) 00:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above all JayJayTalk to me 02:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ABORTION. Lugnuts (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Lugnuts, and block editor for violating WP:POINT. Logical Cowboy (talk) 04:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.