Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy[edit]

List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles proposed for deletion:

The topics covered here have no business being on WP. They are directly from a textbook, and we do not give this treatment to other sources. We are not a repository of such knowledge, and it is not encyclopedic to have the sources alone. Such information is already in the public domain editions of the 1918 textbook and doesn't need to be here.

In addition, they've already served their purpose. Many of these articles were created in 2006 when a large amount of content was taken from Gray's Anatomy 20th edition (1918) and put onto Wikipedia, a process that greatly expanded our anatomical content. The relevant pages have already been entered into anatomy articles (and now transwikied to wikidata) and so are now redundant.

In view of what I've said, I'm proposing deletion.

Notes:

  • Previously successful nomination for image lists (already present on commons): [1] Tom (LT) (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Articles and template plastered
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note – I struck Template:Gray's Anatomy from the nomination because templates are discussed at WP:TFD. North America1000 08:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since the template is entirely dependent on the existence of the articles being discussed here, I suggest that the template be included in this discussion, and then deleted or kept per the principle of “well, duh.” —67.14.236.50 (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - redundant directory of anatomical subjects Kraxler (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.