Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional black conservatives in the United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional black conservatives in the United States[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR based listcruft, fails, WP:LISTN for this is not a category that has been widely covered in third-party sources. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable topic without third-party coverage; lots of non-notable characters, some shows still redlinked, which makes a lot of this border on WP:OR. (And the Boondocks character is originally from the comic strip, not the derivative TV show, and should be linked to the strip.) --Orange Mike | Talk 04:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Pretty much WP:LISTCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 04:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced and not necessary; this isn't a wiki. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does this list realize most of these so-called 'conservatives' are blatant satire (or are either just 'what I see' observations or wild guesses because 'paternal figure on sitcom')? Unsourced and for the most part unnotable. Nate • (chatter) 08:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unnecessary and unsourced. As per nominator. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as above. Never a good sign when I go to search for sources and all of the first many pages of hits are versions of the Wikipedia article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally unsourced, unreferenced, useless, and problematic list. Maybe the list can be replaced by a category, but there is no significant demand for the moment. — 卍・〇・卐 02:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet any Wikipedia standards I'm afraid.TH1980 (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.