Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of crossovers and references in Marvel films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of crossovers and references in Marvel films[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems more fan based than encyclopedic. I am sure what has been said here has been said before in other articles. Jhenderson777 (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This has been discussed here and not only is this a weak, badly sourced article but there is now a superior article covering this topic from a better angle with the relevant sourcing Marvel Cinematic Universe. This article probably was deletable on its (lack of) merits before but is now simply redundant redundant and, as an orphan and unlikely search term even redirecting seems pointless. (Emperor (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Delete: Even if citations, this article comes off as fancruft to me. Outside it's relevance in any real word area, this information is not really important at this moment. Perhaps if these films series with their respective characters merge at some point in story continuity than this can be added to a film series article. Otherwise, this is a unimportant list article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant and poorly referenced. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.