Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Selective merge, and dip the rest. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listcruft. The character synopses can be moved into the mainline article if deemed appropriate, although rereading them, they appear to be or a rather poor quality. The article has been tagged with an 'excessive detail' tag for over nine years now, and the article features precisely zero citations or references. Surely it's not time to throw the article into the proverbial 'vat of dip'? RÆDWALD E|T 23:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing about this article indicates the notability of the list of characters separate from the film that spawned them. bd2412 T 02:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced and not encyclopedic in the slightest. This is not a WFRR wiki. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 02:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above comments. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: most of the content is either plot summary of WP:OR ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the film article, per WP:ATD-M. The nom acknowledges "The character synopses can be moved" but that actually requires a merge, per WP:CWW, and none of the above delete !votes make any case that deletion is a better outcome than an appropriately selective merger, or even a redirection. Jclemens (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, as proposed above, seems like a reasonable way to go. While I do not think there is enough notable about the characters listed here to justify a separate article, there is material here which could be added to the main film article, although I agree the lack of sources needs to be looked at. Dunarc (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - not all of this information would fit in the film's article, but much of it belongs there. Rlendog (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.