Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Ronhjones under criterion G7. (non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 22:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contribution from TBrandley (talk · contribs), who has had several articles up for deletion this week and really needs to learn our proper article criteria. Unsourced information about Simpsons episodes that meet a certain parental ratings guideline (the American TV Parental Guidelines) only applicable to airings in the United States, and even then only in the original airing (if true); episodes are edited down below TV-14 to meet standards in syndication. A related category is also up for a CfD. Nate • (chatter) 09:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Gran² 10:10, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and block editor per WP:DISRUPT. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and as an indiscrimanate collection of information. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 17:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Indiscriminate, pointless fork of List of The Simpsons episodes, US-centric. Reso lute 17:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointless American-centric trivial list. Lugnuts (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete His contributions are not helpful and no matter how many times his stuff if deleted he still does not get it! JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Article in question doesn't seem to exist...... -- Jelly Soup (talk) 07:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Apparently it was speedied by G7 - the author blanked it and requested deletion. - Jorgath (talk) 17:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.