Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mini-Cons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mini-Cons[edit]

List of Mini-Cons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This an overly in-depth list more suited to Wikia. The series has numerous lists (Category:Lists of Transformers characters), so all of these characters are already covered without the need to categorize them by this one aspect. TTN (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the fact that a substantial portion of this list is not bluelinked suggests that deleting this article would lose content not otherwise replicated elsewhere. I'd be far more receptive to a merge proposal. Jclemens (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per perhaps merge to Mini-Con. A lot of this, as best as I can tell, is hyper-trivial, and none of it is sourced. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possibly Keep because the article has a significant number of blue-linked entries to various relevant articles. As such, it qualifies per WP:LISTPURP as a functional navigational aid. The article would benefit from the pruning of unsourced content, and/or with the addition of reliable sources for unverified content that does not have an article. Another option would be to merge to Mini-Con. North America1000 01:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 17:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.