Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Blake Capwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Blake Capwell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ten years no references. I found no reliable ones. Rhadow (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Basically a plot summary. I am against merging because the material here is entirely unsourced.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 08:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not finding anything on search. Artw (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no where near showing the level of impact needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To be considered notable, a television character needs to be reliably sourceable to media coverage which suggests some real-world context for notability — it's not enough to just write an in-universe summary of her own story arc, if you can't demonstrate that she had any impact on real life. But nothing here demonstrates any real-world notability, and none of the content is sourced to justify merging. Bearcat (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 01:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.