Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legitmix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 22:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legitmix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whether this company is notable is marginal. On the other hand, this is a frequent topic of Wiki-PR, so this entire article was probably an attempt at spam. Suggest delete and salt Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep- As I said a while ago on the article's talk page, I think it barely meets WP:GNG, but it's history and PR problems should not be ignored, and killing it's no great loss. Regardless, I think salting may be a bit premature. Is there some reason to think it's likely to be recreated? Grayfell (talk) 03:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's been deleted before. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, sorry, I should've checked that. Yes, salt if it's deleted, by all means. Grayfell (talk) 03:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Currently, it looks promotional. Some of the sources, however, show signs of notability. A complete overhaul could save it. Alexius08 (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Niche coverage, I don't see how this passes WP:COMPANY. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.