Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBTQ+ Production of Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to LGBT reproduction. I think a Merge is a valid closure as it was mentioned by several editors advocating deletion. As for student editors, some of their work that I've seen is worthwhile but it very rare for them to return to edit the project after the school term is over. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LGBTQ+ Production of Family[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per consensus at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 8#LGBTQ+ Production of Family. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 02:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion - there's plenty of content here, but the article is very poorly-written and is redundant to LGBT reproduction and LGBT parenting. Any useful content should be merged to one of those articles, where appropriate. sawyer / talk 03:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Medicine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this reads like a hodgepodge SYNTH and a content fork of several better articles we already have, including LGBT parenting, LGBT reproduction and Artificial insemination. If Fram's claim is true that entire sections were copied without attribution from those other pages, the problem is even more serious. Owen× ☎ 14:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Deletion - As said already by Owen×☎ and sawyer, we already have articles that cover what is mentioned on this one, making the article very redundant, if there is any new information that is properly referenced, should be merged with one of those articles. —Nanami73⚓ (talk). 15:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this article was created by a student editor. It may make sense to move this to the creating users namespace. Esolo5002 (talk) 07:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to LGBT reproduction if there is anything to merge. This is an obvious content fork. My very best wishes (talk) 02:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for either a Merge or Userfying this article to the page creator's sandbox.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: duplicate topic. बिनोद थारू (talk) 04:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.