Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisan Swaraj Sangathan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kisan Swaraj Sangathan[edit]

Kisan Swaraj Sangathan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously deleted via WP:PROD (which I proposed) and was proposed for speedy deletion per WP:G11 by Praxidicae which was declined. The reasoning for the PROD still stands: "Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Article is WP:REFBOMBed with many sources that don't even mention this organization and are about either similar organizations or about the area of advocacy. Creating editor has refused to answer several requests for a WP:COI disclosure, which he/she deletes immediately from his/her talk page." GPL93 (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Well that was a pointless time sink. I’ve looked at the first seven refs provided. No.5 won’t auto translate so I don’t know what it says. The other six don’t mention the article topic at all. I’m not pressing on because it’s clear this organisation isn’t notable and the ref section is a Frankenstein’s monster of things stitched together to try and make this look notable when it isn’t. Mccapra (talk) 02:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG and references dont meet WP:NRV. Bioforce12 (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.