Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer Wasp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Justice Society of America enemies. Sandstein 07:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Wasp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character. There are no worthwhile citations to assert notability. TTN (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Justice Society of America enemies. Reasonable search term and reasonable place to hold basic creation information.--Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taewangkorea (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per User talk:Killer Moff, also WP:PRESERVE. PS - User:TTN, not saying it's been you who's been doing them, but there have been a lot of these minor comic book character AFD nominations lately, merging them to a suitable over-arching topic is normally the result, so why not cut out the middle-man and DIY? FOARP (talk) 07:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Though these articles have been mostly abandoned for a literal decade, there are still random fans who have yet to realize they can move to Fandom. They get in the way of any movement, regardless if it’s BOLD mass redirects/merges or a methodical “leave merge tags and merge discussions for X amount of time” situation. This is the only way to make sure it sticks, and deletion is honestly the best option in my opinion. TTN (talk) 10:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only if people vote for it, and they're not likely to vote straight-delete in this case. FOARP (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.