Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasia Babis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 09:14, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kasia Babis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. She was a candidate in elections but didn't pass. Nominated for an award, but didn't get it. No secondary sources cited and most consist of her own work. Emesik (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Artkomiks and Artystki Lublina are secondary sources, for example. The interview (in a major newspaper) also has a short intro about her aside from the interview itself. Is publishing webcomics internationally and has had quite a few publications in Poland. Also, her comics have been mentioned by notable publications around the world like The Post Italiano, The Canary, Tanzania's Daily News, Huffington Post, Bustle, Metro.Ausir (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete intros to interviews do not count towards being indepdent, secondary sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- They are not the only sources used in the article. Ausir (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Morphenniel (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep a cursory look at the sources seems to indicate at least basic notability.198.58.171.47 (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.