Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I will consider restoring as a redirect if someone wants to merge it somewhere else, but I suggest they come up with some references first. This close doesn't preclude anyone creating a redirect at this title. Hut 8.5 20:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Karone[edit]

Karone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references at all, tag pending since Dec 2009 Devopam (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Article makes no claim of notability, and cites no sources. --Slashme (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Article was merged and redirected into List of Power Rangers Lost Galaxy characters by me per request(s) at the Merger noticeboard and per precedent for fictional, non-notable characters, as discussed here and elsewhere. Merger was reverted by @Emir of Wikipedia: with no improvement to the article. This article is a horribly written, plot-only article with no encyclopedic value, no notability, and no referencing or citations (absolutely zero) and has been sitting as such for over a decade. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted as the discussion at Talk:List_of_Power_Rangers_Lost_Galaxy_characters#Merger_proposal, which was the discussion mentioned in the tag, had no consensus. Richard3120 and Atlantic306 also commented in the discussion. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article is quite well written and I voted against merge in the hope that someone who knew the subject would add real world information and references but unfortunately nothing happened in the next 8 months Atlantic306 (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You certainly are an optimist. The article had ten years to collect notability references and just couldn't. Largely because the subject is wholly non-notable, especially for a stand-alone article. Keep looking up! GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: Do you not think a redirect to List of Power Rangers Lost Galaxy characters is more appropriate? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.