Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karaan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Karaan[edit]

Karaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability outside a game book. Slatersteven (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as the Kotaku link indicates some notability, otherwise restore the previous merge. BOZ (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities, as it already had been prior to the redirect being reverted. As far as I can tell, the Kotaku article is the only non-primary source discussing the deity at all, which is not enough to establish notability, as that requires multiple reliable sources. In addition, that single source itself is not substantial at all. The section on "Reception" in the article is a direct copy and paste of the entirety of what was discussed in the Kotaku article, which quite simply, is not even close to being enough to meet the GNG. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.