Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Dunnavant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Dunnavant[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing significant coverage from reliable sources which are independent of the subject. The sources in the article Some trivial mentions (e.g. [1][2]), and he certainly is covered in non-independent sources (e.g. [3][4][5]). There is one source from NatGeo (which is explained in Justin Dunnavant § National Geographic) which appears to check all the boxes, but we need multiple sources for notability.

I will also note that this article was created with WP:WIKIED – to the creator, please let me know if anything in this nomination is not clear and I would be more than happy to assist! House Blaster^talk 22:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Archaeology. House Blaster^talk 22:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:Too soon. Being part of many research projects does not confer notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California, Florida, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Assistant professors usually have not had time to accumulate enough impact to become notable, and I see nothing here that might indicate an exception to that. The citation record is not yet strong enough for WP:PROF#C1, and the student and postdoctoral awards listed do not pass WP:PROF#C2. The "Outstanding Public Archaeology Initiative Award" might be somewhat more significant, but was given to the "Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter” Virtual Panel, not to Dunnavant personally. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another example of WP:Too soon. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib (talk) 03:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Delete I agree with WP Toosoon. Also the page looks like written from a fan’s point of view - not a good case for Wikipedia biography. --FightBrightTigh (talk) 09:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.