Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Burnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Burnett[edit]

Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:NOTABILITY. Iamawesome800 Talk 01:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep: plays (or played) for a fully professional team, exactly what WP:ATHLETE requires. Ironholds (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per comments below. Ironholds (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless it can be demonstrated that he actually played. Punkmorten (talk) 08:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Never played for the two teams he signed with, the Minnesota Vikings (signed 5/3/2007, waived 6/20/2007) or the Saskatchewan Roughriders (signed 4/1/2008, released 6/1/2008). Baileypalblue (talk) 11:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability. Timneu22 (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability guidelines require that he play, not just be signed. Edward321 (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (strange for me, yes) not because of notability or athlete, but because of lack of sources cited. I'd be very much open to changing my position should the article be improved.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Per multiple delete reasons I added {{Rescue}} as I don't know enough about him to research nor do I feel like doing it :-).--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 20:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rescue tags aren't to be used as a safety-net. In situations like this where it is obvious all the sourcing in the world won't help it is a bit pointless. Ironholds (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.