Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jejemon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - was speedy deleted as G1 (patent nonsense) by Snowolf. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jejemon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism E Wing (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - Fails WP:NEO (sounds almost NFT) and has elements of an attack page. --Darkwind (talk) 05:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 05:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. No notability, and this page has been repeatedly deleted and recreated. Gonzonoir (talk) 07:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's a neologism that doesn't seem to have support. Shadowjams (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete and salt. There's no need to waste any more time on this.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 09:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:NEO. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - appears to be a waste of time. VMS Mosaic (talk) 09:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.