Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaydee (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 07:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jaydee (comics)[edit]

Jaydee (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A mostly walled garden of COI creations of comics (series, characters) of limited notability, reissued and continued by the article creator (on his own publishing house), sourced to webpages by the same person. I can find passing mentions, but no clear indication of notability in reliable, independent sources. Fram (talk) 12:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 17:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 17:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why are all these related to anime and manga? Striking that from delsort AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Lack of coverage in reliable, independent sources; fails GNG. Cjhard (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 17:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, no indication they are notable in any way. ♠PMC(talk) 23:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete apart from the two sites used as references (Hexagon Comics and coolfrenchcomics.com), all I found was a self-published book "BD de Kiosque & science-fiction". power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.