Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hotfire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organisation may not meet notability guidelines. Also seems promotional, with the only references being primary. Also, external links are not appropriate to the article. RoCo^(talk) 18:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Light2021 (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a recently-started enterprise. The references in the article are poor and my own searches are not finding better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional piece -reads like a company press release not an encyclopedia article. Article created by WP:SPA whose only edits involve this article. Google and NYT searches provides nothing to establish notability. CBS527^Talk 02:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero results on all possible reliable source searches done by me. It was quite strange to not get even one source though. This Afd can be closed now. Lourdes 17:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.