Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Kaneko

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus for lack of notability Enterprisey (talk!) 20:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Kaneko[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Holly Kaneko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. JA wiki is also a stub. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN and WP:GNG. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC) - User has been site banned by Arbcom. (This may or may not change the final result based on consensus already established so far)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP - JA wiki is NOT a stub, stop making shit up. Evan1975 (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • :Wow, how rude~ WP:PERSONAL ATTACK right there, haha. I found only 5 sources in the JP article; you mind elaborating how that's not a stub? Also, you might wanna cite some actual guidelines, just saying. ^_^
    Oh, by the way, aren't you the article creator? It's like you're totallly *not* biased or anything, am I right? Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I would argue is that the article should be kept, because I think that there is potential for some constructive translation from the japanese article. I noticed that Evan1975 has some japanese proficiency - certainly more than I - maybe they could contribute further with Kaneko's stage career as described there? There is no doubt that both articles could use more sources, but I think thats symptomatic of the language research barrier. Its too easy to just delete an article like this just because of an initial lack of sources - theres some potential here I think. ƒin (talk) 23:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The JA article is practically a filmography dump with less than one full paragraph for the biography. What's there to expand? Lack of sources is lack of sources. Do you have any guidelines to cite in your counterargument? Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No reliable sources, nothing to establish notability. Esw01407 (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails notability, No reliable sources. --SalmanZ (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no sources. No major roles. Nothing on ANN encyclopedia to lead to possible sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Dream Focus 10:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • IMDB isn't a reliable source though as the content is user submitted and not overseen for mistakes. (see: WP:A&M/ORS) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a situational source, and can be used to shortcut verify the roles as long as the credit itself has a green check-mark that leads to an on-screen capture of the closing credit that confirms the role. The problem is that I don't see any check marks next to the roles mentioned. I would go through the websites listed on our ORS list to see if you can find anything. Another good place to look is here: [1]. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Holly_Kaneko&oldid=925542176"